|
Post by Chuck on Feb 24, 2011 19:28:15 GMT -6
@ Nadia, what exactly makes you characterize my post as "pushing hard"? I asked Rachel a question about why she thought Flava was town, because it sure looked to me like he was doing scummy things. Is it that she finds him too scummy to be scum? Cause I'm not sure I like that argument very much. I asked John a question about his "I second that" post, because I dislike that type of post. Even if you want to agree with someone, I appreciate it when you expand on why you agree and what exactly you agree with. I don't think asking for answers to why people think Flava is town is "pushing hard".
Having said that I don't think my post was "pushing hard", however, I am a pretty firm believer in lynching all liars. I don't think townies should lie to town -- especially without a good reason and with bad results like a townie getting lynched. It is far and away the most anti-town thing I've seen happen so far.
|
|
|
Post by Nadia on Feb 24, 2011 20:53:58 GMT -6
Well after Hal died you were like "lets just lynch that scum Flava" or something along that sort.
|
|
|
Post by Chuck on Feb 24, 2011 21:11:39 GMT -6
OK. I think a lot of us were pretty irritated at the time. I still don't understand why that makes you say that I am "pushing hard". I don't remember saying anything like that, but I might have. Do you have a quote?
|
|
|
Post by Nadia on Feb 24, 2011 21:45:40 GMT -6
It was in the chat after the execution, if someone has a log.
|
|
|
Post by Chuck on Feb 24, 2011 22:12:51 GMT -6
Nadia, you put something in quotes in your previous post. That sort of implied that it was a quote. But then you said " or something along that sort. " Now you are too lazy to find the actual quote. Do you not have the log? Are you too lazy to actually look for the log? Are you just trying to smudge me by not finding the quote and thinking that everyone will assume that is what I said? BTW Randi had already helpfully posted the log: maskmafia1.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=gotopost&board=fairgrounds&thread=476&post=2186
|
|
|
Post by Nadia on Feb 25, 2011 4:33:57 GMT -6
[21:28] Chuck: huh? why would we want to protect lieing scum flava? [21:28] Chuck: huh? why would we want to protect lieing scum flava? [21:28] Chuck: huh? why would we want to protect lieing scum flava? [21:28] Chuck: huh? why would we want to protect lieing scum flava? [21:28] Chuck: huh? why would we want to protect lieing scum flava? [21:28] Chuck: huh? why would we want to protect lieing scum flava?
Automatic assumption that Flava is scum.
|
|